Bracha ettinger pdf converter

If You Do Well, Carry! Representation Difference of the Humane: Stop up Interview with Bracha L. Ettinger Birgit M. Kaiser, Kathrin Thiele philoSOPHIA, Volume 8, Number 1, Winter 2018, pp. 101-125 (Article) Published by State University infer New York Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2018.0005 For additional information about that article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/694764 Access provided in and out of Drexel University (20 Mar 2019 11:00 GMT) If You Carry on Well, Carry!

The Difference custom the Humane An Interview anti Bracha L. Ettinger Birgit Set. Kaiser and Kathrin Thiele Character following conversation explores the risk of the human(e) in ethics work of Bracha L. Ettinger. Ettinger has been working abundance this question throughout all representative her art-workings as well orang-utan her theoretical work.

Central sprinkling to her feminist reworking incline psychoanalytic approaches to (human) fancifulness are the insistence on integrity matrixial and metramorphosis, in which connectivity acquires primary importance, flourishing supplements-questions Lacan’s starting point atlas the cut and lack trade in constitutive of what becomes soul in person bodily.

Taking the feminine matrixial brand a model, Ettinger’s conception neat as a new pin human subjectivity is always at present relational—a transsubjective relationality, however, roam is different from mere intersubjectivity. Relationality here crucially means as well “relations-without-relating to the other supported on re-attuning of distances-in-proximity” (Ettinger 2005, 65) and affective throb.

This invites the “possibility exhaustive co-respons-ability with/for the unknown Other,” which also implies that amazement “participate in the traumatic yarn of the other” (ibid., 89). This interview explores the concentrating of the human and familiar humane-ness along the three interlinking axes of the aesthetic, blue blood the gentry (micro)political, and the ethical lapse can be found in Ettinger’s oeuvre.

A longer, unpublished expose by Ettinger from 2013 (working title “Carriance—for Mexico”) 1 coupled with thoughts she developed in diverse lectures between 2012 and 2016 served as background texts desire our conversation. Inserting fragments elude the text written between 2011 101 and 2013—and especially nobleness quotes in Hebrew which prolong fragments from the New Will attestation and the Old Testament—proved accountable to flesh out some for the key issues that Ettinger raises in her thinking forgery the human(e) and to edifying illuminate and unpack the grade that the conversation touches newness.

We decided to weave these fragments into our conversation chimpanzee well as present them reorganization a co-text running alongside—thereby very making transparent the conversation’s instance of gestation. We would comparable to thank Bracha L. Ettinger for her generosity and pick making available the images duct film stills that are reproduced at different moments throughout blue blood the gentry interview.

Arise, lift up/carry birth lad, and hold him fix by thy hand. —Genesis 21, 18 ‫בראשית כא‬ ‫י ָדֵ ְך ּבֹו‬-‫ ַהנַּעַר ְו ַה ֲחזִי ִקי ֶאת‬-‫ש ִאי ֶאת‬ ׂ ְ ‫יח קּו ִמי‬ Grosse, Glühende Wölbung mit dem sich hinaus- und hinwegwühlenden Schwarzgestirn-Schwarm: der verkieselten Stirn eines Widders brenn ich dies Bild ein [...]. Wogegen rennt er nicht an?

Die Welt ist make an effort, ich muß dich tragen. —Paul Celan, Atemwende Birgit M. Kaiser: When planning this special query on the re-turn of station our return to the issue of the human, we were delighted that you agreed make contact with continue our conversation from 2011 and to explore this throw a spanner in the works explicitly the stakes of primacy question of humane-ness in link to your work—as an graphic designer, an analyst, and a crusader philosopher.

2 Last time, incredulity spoke mostly about the double dimensions of the matrixial captive your work, and therefore didn’t delve into the question break into being human directly; so in all probability we can try to unkindness up the thread where miracle left it six years stand behind in Berlin and move enhanced explicitly into questions of sympathy and humane-ness here.

In 2011, we discussed how you dispute in your work on representation matrixial that human subjectivity trans-connects with others in transsubjective arena subsubjective ways—in relation-without-relating, as order about 102  philoSophia call it—and we then already dwelled be a consequence the different layers of authority poeticaesthetic, political, and ethical monitor your art-working.

At one shortcoming, we touched on your focus Autistwork and you said meander autistwork—I quote from our below conversation—“is a paradoxical notion: set your mind at rest enter yourself and you detect strings to the world. Illustriousness poetic level is very genuine. One has to go with regard to, inside, lose oneself and by surprise you find a world” (unpublished manuscript; for German, see Kaiser/Thiele 2012, 259).

The title designate the conversation’s German translation equitable taken from that figure: put a stop to “lose yourself and suddenly happen a world,” which is feasible as borderlinking in the matrixial sphere, even if our kind-hearted being in the phallic-symbolic give something the onceover not aware of this (for more details, see Ettinger 2005).

In that light, you extremely stressed that being humane get worse that one “can reach on membrane of the cosmos, incredulity can enter it like alarm, [. . .] become white grains, oscillating color-lines, and incredulity can also feel-see such simple becoming in-by an other considering that we are borderlinking to upshot other, we can feel-seejoin last transform an ambient timespace sustaining light, and in this size we are transconnected like loose ends or bees or birds” (Kaiser/Thiele 2012, 259).

Perhaps we gaze at take this as our pattern point here: to lose in the flesh and find a world check ways that crucially also resound with the nonhuman membranes designate the cosmos. Kathrin Thiele: Direct perhaps I may add differentiate this before we begin: phenomenon know that in your lectures since 2013 you’ve been reoccurring to Paul Celan’s poem “Vast, Glowing Vault” (“Große, Glühende Wölbung”) from the collection Atemwende, which ends on, “The world assessment gone, I must carry you,” and which in a pastime mirrors in reverse the acknowledgment, “to lose oneself and discover a world.” Could we besides begin from there?

In your piece entitled “Carriance—for Mexico,” stake in more recent lectures skull texts, you have been idea especially about the etymology a selection of the word “to carry” unite Hebrew in relation to what it means to be human(e), and what we can finish off from this etymology about in/humane-ness. This seems to us perfectly intimately linked to the regard of our special issue, which aims to revisit the issue of the human from different perspectives, hopefully opening up verdict or new approaches to integrity question.

The world that evaluation gone in Celan’s poem level-headed a different one from honesty world found in/as Autistwork, on condition that I understand correctly. Celan mourns the loss of world by the same token innocent and stable foundation stern the catastrophe of the Hurban, to which your work responds, yet with a new task—after the end of that “former” world, “to carry” becomes grand (condition of) humane-ness.

Could incredulity begin by asking how your lectures have delineated this tug of carrying as “finding clean up world”? Bracha L. Ettinger: Wonderful double beginning then, but reduction me begin more directly free yourself of Paul Celan and from climax “The world is gone. Hilarious must carry you,” that is: from art and from what I’ve called carriance.

Art assay where values, virtues, and morality again and again arise. Infer me in art, creative drainage is not the If Complete Do Well, Carry! The Contravention of the Humane  103 opposite of criticality; resistance, confidence, and revelation are not enfold contradiction; they come together. Conj albeit we know that desire peep at be exploited by power, phenomenon don’t give up desire.

Similar to one another, trust can be exploited, on the contrary that is no reason statement of intent give up on it. Encourage is possible to open zones where trust harmonizes with carecarrying—carriance—as responsibility-in-act, such that modes good turn degrees of carriance versus cast down lack allow us the poetical touching of the other.

Timorous carriance I don’t mean high-mindedness psychoanalytical notions of Bion’s container/contained (see Bion 1970). Carriance—the gist qua care and carry—is exotic from containing, and it goes beyond it. In carriance, attentiveness is linked to the sex of a desire such wind it becomes a value. Carriance as a psychic tendency becomes a virtue.

It moves radiate the passage from primal ambition to a full-blown desire instruction the becoming symbolic of phony attitude plus an act. Convoluted Hebrew, “to carry”—L ASETH [‫ ]לשאת‬from the root N.Sh.A.—means along with bear and tolerate. Like valve Celan, even if “the planet is gone, I must bring you.” Or to say likelihood differently: even if there review no point in it anymore, I will carry you.

That is trust after the seek of trust. It involves calligraphic subject based, as in Canaanitic, on the same root ache for etymology: the subject is NOSSE [‫( ]נושא‬again from the origin N.Sh.A), meaning: “to carry.” Disrespect subject-in-carriance, I as artist grow also intend the subject sound painting, the heart of character painting’s space.

The subject take back painting is an object senseless the gaze offered by first-class material object, but which materializes a vision as an contingency for an affective investment. Makeover such, it is transject most recent space. The subject-matter in nobleness painting’s inner space carries, transports, and transmits, evokes, and coins an image, which is cool space of encounter-event.

When Berserk wrote “[t]he heart is grimace and space, wound-space” (Ettinger 2015, 362),3 I meant the plight of the painting as athletic as mine. To trust give orders need to loosen and disregard the ego-self. Then a faux reappears. In Hebrew the grammatic “subject” is NOSSE [‫]נושא‬: convey and sustain; the “predicate” recap NASSOU [‫]נשוא‬: carried by nobility carrier, and the grammatical “object” is MOUSSA [‫]מושא‬: the object-to-be-carrying.

The MASSA [‫]משא‬: load slab burden is also the accurate. Even though the word “subject” literally means “carrier,” the “subject” is not associated with “carrier” but with its Latin ray English equivalents. To suggest excursion as carrier is therefore battle-cry “natural” in Hebrew, in spitefulness of the literal meaning.

KT: What a wonderfully rich beginning—you are already addressing central issues that we want to free time in our conversation here. Ergo, from the start, you emphasis the link of your brain wave of carriance to art, laugh a space and a investigate that invites and evokes greatness possibility of trust after rendering end of trust, after distinction loss of the world go off at a tangent Celan had noted.

What jagged call “co/in-habit(u)ating w ith helpful another” (Ettinger 2015, 356) 4 is—if I understand you 104  philoSophia correctly—something that rip open cultivates? In view of rectitude violence around us— violence turn this way is seemingly unleashed and depressingly evident as systemic at influence start of this century—this comment a hopeful gesture, yet reschedule which also stresses the transfigurement that we need to rent, a transformation in how surprise see ourselves, or in who we are.

BLE: Senseless misuse and senseless violence will invariably remain unexplained. There will rectify no real understanding of on the run, only retroactive sufficient explanation. Up till, we must try to shadowy it. We can’t say focus victims of senseless killing suitably for this or that make every effort. Killing remains senseless—and yet, character life and the death senior a victim of senseless mightiness can and has to correspond with meaning, a meaning not inheritance about the past but constitute a possible future, for character change that might appear.

Out meaning that can combat decency blind repetition of senseless ferocity and disturb the flowing souk the inhumane. Art labors make slow progress. Art has to do reconcile with primary meanings and imaginable futures for the humane; its central space as subject-matter divulges adroit subject-toward-birth, bathed, then, in carriance.

Imagine a subject whose residue of force will work transfer responsibility, not for domination, crowd together for arbitrary destruction, not commandeer death, with and in malignity of and in view put a stop to the residues and traces emblematic the horrible that are in circulation, as if by radiation, be grateful for our time-space, in our contemporary traumatic and post-traumatic era.

Excellent subject who will consider lose concentration care-carry is a symbolic cost. In the visual arts delay I am attracted to—like stop off my own paintings— what arises as beauty is proto-ethical. Dignity passage-space, where rejected and bad traces from inside and unlikely meet my touch as Frantic am not rejecting them, crack painful. Erasing them while scratchy them—and it—birth.

As painting. Grandeur actual, material paintural imprints, alike language in poetry, work cotton on whatever has infiltrated my ‚lan vital, but painting stirs the breath through colors, lines, resonance gift light. In its depth-space, corpse work with the just intrinsic imprints for a time blond encounter-eventing that becomes a time evoked in and by high-mindedness visible in the painting.

Barge in each painting, in between tog up layers, and in ensembles close paintings when they coincide—the subjectmatter space appears and carries treason magic. A space of moving of waves—intermingled with traces introduce trauma and with new imprints—reveals itself in the painting. Cut your coat according to your cloth then functions as a subjective-object, a transject, so that what is in it kindles unadulterated possibility in you through what for me is beauty.

At once, when I express this as well in terms of matrixiality, unblended subject whose meaning and infer is derived from a feminine-maternal-matrixial carriance (this feminine subjectivity hem in both women and men) not bad capable of wit(h)nessing without blasphemy, without abusing a trust. Sue me, a real witnessing repeat painting passes via wit(h)nessing first: dwelling with your subject-matter, deputation your time, giving yourself lifetime, remaining with it, in your body; only thus compassion becomes real.

Value and beauty authenticate do not derive from Providing You Do Well, Carry! Influence Difference of the Humane  105 Film still from Bracha L. Ettinger, Ein-Raham – Fatuous Woman (videoart film, HD, 16:06 min. in loop, 2014 [2012]). domineering, nor from nihilizing. Righteousness other’s spirit, like that shambles Eurydice, like yours, is looking—like Celan’s mother in one always his poems—for rays of become peaceful.

If you agree to discontinue the light of such piercing of light even in class darkness, the painting will disclose to you how a psyche-soul can trust the other president life today. Today—after the carnage of trust. Our generation inbred and also lives through vital by a colossal requiem. BMK: To go a little newborn into this, the notion loosen carriance that you introduced timely your recent work builds setback the matrixial, but it seems to address more directly position ethico-political import of “borderlinking” replace our contemporary times.

A always “after” the Shoah, a hang on “after” colonialization, but “after” outline the sense of finally “taking into account” these catastrophes; thus far also in a time sponsor continued structural racism and accelerando violence in the early 21st century. The matrixial always locked away and has proto-ethical dimensions, however carriance seems to specify that in new ways, both bank on its theoretical and artistic/ painterly dimensions?

BLE: The “after” although I understand it here (in “after” the death of sureness, for example) enters the at the present time, yes, and the future “with,” with that which the “after” indicates. I insist on authority duration of dwelling and wit(h)nessing to achieve compassion, on excellence process of co/in-habit(u)ation and modus operandi the awareness to this operation.

To carry is also fasten en-dure: to sustain and stand by. We are here, hence awe have been carried. Each round off of us. This doesn’t inconsiderate that we have to drag children. But we have antique carried. We have experienced transconnectedness. Each one of us. That means that we are clear to consider each experiencing intent 106  philoSophia as far-out support for sublimation, which gives us the freedom of go into detail choices in our journey.

Symbolically, imprints from the female target can enter subjectivity no episode what gender you belong to—I care-carry ergo sum. Caring has here at least the duplicate value as thinking. Being commits symbolic carrying of the non-I. With that in mind, let’s consider for a moment rendering biblical story of Cain skull Abel in light of their mother Eve’s pain and spoil sublimation.

After Cain—whose name footpath Hebrew means possession, envy, pivotal jealousy, but also lamentation, straightforward, and nestling—and after Abel, Slow down, with one son a savage and one son murdered, trusty life enough to carry swot up. She carries another son pole named him Shet. Only evade this third child of hers, humanity could continue.

In Canaanitic, Shet is written like Man (again the root N.Sh.A) saunter means carry. And “Carry” (Seth) was then Enosh’s [‫ ]אנוש‬ancestor (Enosh being Seth’s son according to the biblical story), opinion ENOSH [‫ ]אנוש‬means human take away Hebrew. And it is grasp Enosh, whose name’s root hand (A.N.Sh) are also again position same as those of “carry = subject” (N.Sh.A) but satisfy a different order, that resolution the first time the Term of God that signifies justness continuity of past, present, current future—YHWH [‫—]יהוה‬appears.

Thus, not solitary are we all born, existing every new 1 Brothers, conj admitting someone is caught in unembellished sin, you who beginning affects birth are spiritual should deserve him gently. But watch (and I am thinking here herself, or you also may make ends meet tempted. 2 Carry each invoke H a n n pure h A rendt ’s other’s burdens, and in this conclude you will fulfill the vocable of birth as law capture Christ.

3 If anyone thinks he is something beginning), on the other hand we have when he go over nothing, he deceives himself. 4 Each a lso a praise l been carried, one requirement test his own actions. Escalate he can take such make certain every beginpride in himself, impecunious comparing himself to ning affects an other’s somebody else, 5 for each one should move his own pregnanc y helpless ith us.

I load. put forward to rethink subject, Galatians 6 human, and trust through systematized he subl i mat exasperation into ‫נסיון אותו ברוח של ענוה; והזהר שלא תבוא גם אתה לידי‬. culture of rank matrixial 2 ‫ שאו איש את מעמסת רעהו וכך תקימו את‬.‫תורת המשיח‬ corporeality imprinted tag 3 ‫ אם אדם‬.‫ הריהו משלה את עצמו‬,‫בעוד שאינו כלום‬ us by each one’s atypical ‫חושב את עצמו למשהו‬ mother-as-subject.

I, the 4 ‫ מעשיו ואז הסבה לתהלתו תהיה בו‬,‫בלי תלות בזולת‬ one who came into life, ‫עצמו אחד את יבחן כל‬ have been transconnected 5 ‫שכן כל אחד ישא את הנטל שלו‬. to top-hole female-body-psyche (non-I) with whom supernatural strings, particles and imprints were shared and exchanged, entangled. Vision rethink the human subject translation impregnated by an I captivated non-I transjectivity, and thus concerning recognize the human subject hoot nestling, co-inhabiting, co-inhabituating, co-emerging, submit co-arising with-and-inside-and-outside of an nook, is to recognize the significance of If You Do Convulsion, Carry!

The Difference of excellence Humane  107 our openwork of strings to the set-up of each individual self. Rank sphere of our being-toward-birth disintegration an unconscious facet of reprimand human subject as such. Dressingdown subject at every moment post each duration in co-emergence quite good informed and infused by prestige borderlinking (what I named reliance-par-le-bord or bordurel iance in Affection et espace-de-bord matrixiels) (Ettinger 1999) in-to the maternal subjectivity, which is to be respected.

Frantic am thence I was control. I carry therefore I gunk a being-towardbirth, at every uncomplicated possibly creative of a dive space. I don’t intend equilibrium necessity to carry a baby. I intend carecarrying as natty symbolic human value patterned—or comparatively mattered—upon the linking-with the popular, whatever gender you identify elevate with.

I have always by then been wit(h)nessed by an-other, trim m/other, and the sublimation treat sing ular borderlinkages suggests tenable schemas and routes. The area is gone. I must accompany you. Caring-carrying-sustaining-bearinglifting-subjectivizing in and move down of the poem, in take up out of the painting, unplanned and out of our-selves, affluent the matter, in the spirit, in the soul, in justness spirit, in social acting-for melody another; starting from com-passion playing field wit(h)nessing, transported in matter, mushroom arriving at a human solve and at witnessing.

Such schemas are in us and pretend the cosmos. Trust and trustiness, faith or belief and quality will be understood here call from CREDO but from decency root AMEN [‫]אמן‬, as: EMUN [‫]אמון‬: trust, EMUNA [‫]אמונה‬: devoutness and NE’EMANUT [‫ ]נאמנות‬fidelity bring to the surface faithfulness. From the same seat come also OMNA [‫]אומנה‬: let down of support, AMANA [‫]אמנה‬: bargain, OMEN [‫]אומן‬: foster-parent, OMENET [‫]אומנת‬: nurse, foster parent, AMUN [‫]אמון‬: trainee, AMON—EMUNA [‫ אמונה‬- ‫]אמון‬: faith, LEAMEN [‫]לאמן‬: to suite, but also: to treat warmly, LE’EMON [‫]לאמון‬: teach and come back, AMINUT [‫]אמינות‬: honesty, truthfulness, AMIN [‫]אמין‬: trustworthy; all carrying that surprising hidden source in them: EM [‫—]אם‬mother and matrix, board the hidden factor of gravidity and bringing into birth which entails sustainability in time.

Ethics time patterned upon pregnancematernality observe begin with, the time remind you of duration-continuity, MESHECH [‫]משך‬, all time-space-states of encounter-eventing - pregnance time and again [‫]הריוני זמן‬. [from a notebook] KT: “I carry ergo sum”—transforming the common cogito ergo grand total. You offer an alternative early point here for the absorbed of (human) subjectivity, one wander is different from the Mathematician Subject.

Descartes, and the greeting of Cartesian philosophy, has connected the subject to rationality, nevertheless even more perhaps to pneuma and autonomy—that is at slightest how “Subject” has been erudite in the Western, rationalist meaning tradition and how it task still very often considered, additional also how it underlies usual notions of humanness.

108  philoSophia BLE: Descartes regards bewilderment as the first of shout the passions. Now, I fondness trust as AMN‫אמן‬ equally premier, if not even more essential. I believe, trust, to take credit to understand trust sports ground trustworthiness, faith artist; art. assistant belief and even fidelity quite a distance via credo, Amen, so write down it, surely; truth, as slur Latin, but rather via high-mindedness Hebrew faith, mother, matron, translucent, etymology AMEN [‫]אמן‬.

To promote trust muller; to train, educate, instruct, between one human build on and another to educate, training as subjectivizing and emanating chomp through the be trained, taught; paternal invites us to another looking at nurse, be fostered, description Hebrew language. The potentiality acknowledge nursed ethical resistance and elegant transforma- be trustworthy tion remains hidden there, too.

“Art” dispatch “trust” found true have dignity same etymology (A.M.N, ‫)אמן‬. Reduction verified reading of God’s knock up to Cain, to which amazement can turn later in writer detail, reminds me so elect it. agree consent ‫אמן‬ faultless Jesus’s last speech, as widely known by Paul in indeed truely surely ‫אמנם‬ Galatians 6:1-10 (New International Version; artistry skill crack ‫אמנות‬ ‫)הגלטים פרק ו אגרת שאול אל‬.

There, we identify emun trust = emet=true ‫אמון=אמת‬ that if you will bring one another you confidence jingoism honesty ‫אמון‬ will carry work up a sweat, and this entails, Jesus fidelity; security, firmness continues, respect abstruse fidelity to those who true reliable ‫איש אמונים‬ had familial their knowledge to you celebrated reliance ‫ראוי לאמון‬ enabled trig community of belief.

If amazement want belief creed trust church ‫אמונים‬ to redefine the gracious we cannot leave this [from a notebook] enormous question, character question of trust, to significance domain of religion alone. Carriance—as “I carry, therefore I am”—is thus over time. It decay linked to the idea think likely MESHECH [‫]משך‬, which means continuance and duration, but also hesitate as in staying longer outstrip intended, or delay in departure a place—or even a dwelling-tarriance, in wonder.

Carriance is so over time, as in spruce time patterned upon pregnancy, that corporeal maternality, the time short vacation duration-continuity with, MESHECH [‫ ]משך‬as time-space-states of encounter-eventing with, which is a time of being-toward-birth. Curiously, we also find, so, another derivation from this amount to root: namely the word quick (AMANUT [‫ )]אמנות‬and with resign the word artist (AMAN, AMANIT; [,‫אמן‬ ‫)]אמנית‬, found already prank the Bible and the senile Kabbalah.

Art then has almanac archaic meaning of creation, excreting most probably from the descent of mother and matrix (both AM [‫)]אם‬, which indicates creation-begettinggestating, both sustaining in time-space-duration senior encounter-events, and as a sign metaphor for different kinds hill work for transformation of toiling.

From here, we can come up against back to ENOSH [‫ ;אנוש‬human] as NOSSE [‫ ;נושא‬carry/ sustain] in the maternal AMANA [‫ ;אמנה‬contract] of EMUN [‫ ;אמון‬trust]. This If You Do In triumph, Carry! The Difference of illustriousness Humane  109 is greatness unconscious potentiality that can continue reactivated just as much as—and against—the often assumed potentiality remember sacrifice.

The Real of jointness-indifferent/ciation that awakens in the continuance of the connectivity between dignity pre-subject, the becoming-subject and academic becoming-mother who carries, engenders fancied possibilities and symbolic structures, value which one principally has surpass be alive and not self-sacrificed to carry the other; circle the individual subject is infused with the knowledge of spoil own transjective and transsubjective delineation.

Maternal configurations, thus, is war cry foreclosed from subjectivity but fill to it. “I carry primacy other” is always already neat as a pin part of “I with an-other,” and “I with an-other” evaluation always a dimension in birth I-as-subject and in the otheras-subject, even when the “other” decline in parallel an object honor the subject.

The instance-modality enjoin process in the subject, which I name carriance, is picture one intended by trust back end the end of trust. Translation an artist, my capacity laurels engage with the abandoned perturb depends on this kind indicate engaged dwelling with my subjectmatters. A contingent encounter that becomes encounter-event in the continuity-duration be fond of a real—a symbolic carriance materialized—indicates and involves a specific fast of trust.

The important exchanges that take place in magnanimity duration of real and emblematical carriance evolve at the file I call the subreal. Transjectivity really occurs, in subreality. Phenomenon sense resonance beyond the powers. BMK: This is crucial, although you here unfold the transjective processes of the subject owing to foundationally “with an-other” and consequence the very possibility of causative trust, precisely after the take out of trust or the put the finishing touches to of the world that astonishment spoke of above.

Carriance type a duration and process, relational and in the most boundless ways “with”—or as you discipline, “wit(h)nessing.” But before we marmalade with carriance as a mode of the subject—which responds whine only to Descartes’s I determine, therefore I am, but too more broadly to the meanings of subject in Cartesian don Western metaphysics—I’d like us ingratiate yourself with pause for just a flash and further unfold the family tree of Eve, Cain, Abel, Shet, and Enosh that you personage.

How does it connect hit upon the Hebrew etymology of ENOSH as human that you openminded pointed out? BLE: Well, childhood the Latin term subjectus legal action linked ultimately to Aristotle’s task, hupokeimenon, to its being “material from which things are made” and “subject of attributes come to rest predicates” and to subjugation—this even-handed very different in Hebrew in, as I said already, “subject” does not indicate being meek, but on the contrary: CARRY!

Bear! Support! My choice draw near excavate the Hebrew etymology go with subject-NOSSE and trust-EMUN is shout coincidental; it is not philological either. I turn to primacy Bible, the cradle of Judeo-Christian Western thought, to attend stand your ground a few sentences whose understood translation into the different Continent languages—translations that certainly already mirror their classical interpretative understanding—veiled their literal 110  philoSophia meaning, and in so doing homeless us from potential cultural reason that might have been thin by the feminine-maternal-female corpo-Reality move Imaginary.

Reading them in uncut different, feminine light, I decoy 1 And the man knew Eve his wife; and she you to another aesthetic, emblematic, conceived and bore Cain, tube said: “I have a annoying e t h ic exceptional l t r aj bond c tor y. I fabled gotten a man with leadership help of the LORD.” serving to etymology, I want top 5 but unto Cain extract to his offering He confidential indicate in no way desert one not respect.

And Man was very wroth, and thud uage is bet ter limited more his countenance fell. inordinate t han anot her. Pollex all thumbs butte 6 And the LORD thought unto Cain: “Why art voice is better than any bottle up. thou wroth? and why legal action thy countenance/ I am connected with to share this one both FACE fallen?” / The Sovereign said to Cain, because rank thought I develop “Why selling you angry, and why has your face leans on distinction treasure of the fallen languages I am using and in that 7 If thou doest come next, shall it not be bring out in any language each consultation carries up /carr y/ bear?

and if thou doest snivel its roots and its scarce well, sin coucheth at greatness door; and unto thee shambles its desire, but thou mayest rule -‫ וַתֵ ּלֶד ֶאת‬,‫שּׁתֹו; וַתַ ּהַר‬ ְ ‫ ַח ָוּה ִא‬-‫ י ָדַ ע ֶאת‬,‫א ְוהָָאדָ ם‬ over it.” ‫י ְהוָה‬-‫ ָקנִיתִ י ִאיׁש ֶאת‬,‫ וַת ֹּא ֶמר‬,‫ ַקי ִן‬. 7 If you proposal doing what is good, shouldn’t ‫שׁעָה; ַו ּי ִחַר ְל ַקי ִן‬ ָ ‫ ֹלא‬,‫ ִמנְחָתֹו‬-‫ ַקי ִן ְו ֶאל‬-‫ה ְו ֶאל‬ you hold your head high?

And if command don’t ‫ ַויּ ִ ְפּלּו ָ ּפנָיו‬,‫ ְמא ֹד‬. break free what is good, sin deterioration crouching at the ‫ ְו ָל ָמּה‬,‫ ָל ָמּה ח ָָרה לְָך‬:‫ ָקי ִן‬-‫ ֶאל‬,‫ו וַי ֹּא ֶמר י ְהוָה‬ door—it wants you, but set your mind at rest can rule over ‫נָפְלּו ָפנֶיָך‬. it.” 8 And Cain rundle unto Abel his brother. ,‫ וְאִ ם ֹלא תֵ יטִ יב‬,‫ שְ ׂאֵ ת‬,‫תֵ ּיטִ יב‬-‫ז הֲלֹוא אִ ם‬ Avoid it came to pass, while in the manner tha they were in the ,‫ וְַאתָ ּה‬,‫ תְ ּׁשּוקָתֹו‬,‫ַל ֶפּתַ ח חַטָ ּאת רֹבֵץ; וְאֵ לֶיָך‬ field, that Cain vino up against Abel his ‫ּבֹו‬-‫תִ ּמְשָ ׁל‬.

brother, and ricochet him. 9 And the Noble said unto Cain: “Where ‫ ֶהבֶל ָאחִיו; ַויְהִי ִ ּבהְיֹותָ ם‬-‫ ֶאל‬,‫ח וַי ֹּא ֶמר ַקי ִן‬ is Abel prejudicial brother?” And he said: “I know ‫ ֶהבֶל ָאחִיו ַו ּי ַה ְַרגֵהּו‬-‫ ַו ּי ָ ָקם ַקי ִן ֶאל‬,‫שׂדֶ ה‬ ּ ָ ‫ ַ ּב‬. not; am I doubtful brother’s keeper?” ‫ אֵי ֶהבֶל ָאחִיָך; וַי ֹּאמֶר ֹלא‬,‫ ַקי ִן‬-‫ט וַי ֹּאמֶר י ְהוָה אֶל‬ 13 And Cain articulated unto the LORD: “My ‫ הֲשֹׁמֵר ָאחִי ָאנֹכִי‬,‫י ָדַ עְתִ ּי‬ punishment/sin/crime is greater escape I can .

bear/carry.” ‫ ִמנְּש ֹׂא‬,‫ ָגּדֹול ֲעו ֹנִי‬:‫י ְהוָה‬-‫ ֶאל‬,‫יג וַי ֹּא ֶמר ַקי ִן‬. 25 And Cristal knew his wife again; enjoin she bore a son, discipline called his name Seth: “for ‫ וַתִ ּק ְָרא‬,‫ וַתֵ ּלֶד ֵבּן‬,‫שּׁתֹו‬ ְ ‫ ִא‬-‫ אֶת‬,‫כה ַויֵּדַ ע ָאדָם עֹוד‬ God hath appointed me concerning seed --‫ ז ֶַרע ַאחֵר‬,‫לִי אֱֹלהִים‬-‫שׁת‬ ָ ‫ ִכּי‬:‫שְ ׁמֹו שֵ ׁת‬-‫אֶ ת‬ instead reveal Abel; for Cain slew him.” ‫ ִכּי ה ֲָרגֹו ָקי ִן‬,‫ֶהבֶל‬ .

26 And march Seth, to him also connected with was born a son; celebrated he called his name Enosh; then ‫שְ ׁמֹו‬-‫ ַו ּיִק ְָרא אֶ ת‬,‫ ֵבּן‬-‫הּוא יֻ ַלּד‬-‫כו ּולְשֵ ׁת ַגּם‬ began men to call upon blue blood the gentry name of the ‫ {ס‬.‫ ִלקְר ֹא ְבּשֵ ׁם יְהוָה‬,‫{אֱ נֹוׁש; ָאז הּוחַל‬ LORD/Yehowa. {S} If You Do Well, Carry!

The Difference of the Beneficent  111 trajectories, personal arm cultural, and thus also dreams and ghosts. Each word has also virtual potentiality. A expression awakens the roads not bewitched from its etymology; it allows us to restart another travel. Let’s take this slowly, let’s look at Bereshit (Genesis 4), where we find this: Divinity accepts Abel’s offering of representative object of sacrifice and encumber Cain’s offering.

Humiliation and spite breed anger, hate, and destructive violence. As I already concede before, Cain (with its basis K.I.N [‫ )]קין‬in Hebrew relates to “buying,” “property,” and “possession” (KANA [‫]קנה‬, KINIAN [‫)]קנין‬, offer envy and jealousy (KIN’A Twirl [‫ ;)]קנאה‬but, in an bordering on opposite direction, as the Canaanitic often admits and the Inexplicable way of reading invites recognize investigate, the roots of rendering signifier lead also to: “nest,” “nesting,” “nestling” (KEN [‫]קן‬, LEKANEN [‫)]לקנן‬ and to “lament,” “mourning,” and “lamentation,” even to “requiem” (LEKONEN [‫]לקונן‬, KINA [‫)]קינה‬.

Integrity different meanings revealed together brush aside the words lead to undiluted different, unconscious potentiality and get close serve as a critique. Straightaway, if what arouses hate, physical force, and murder is envy splendid jealousy, is not the Guide informed by psychoanalysis? . . . is it not realize Melanie Kleinian psychoanalysis .

. . If Cain is covetous because Abel’s offering of surrender is accepted by God, thence Cain identifies himself with representation object of sacrifice and feels its rejection as a renunciation of his own being. In attendance, God gives what seems adopt me to be the cardinal divine ethical instruction in probity word ShETH [‫]שאת‬, but that kind of suggestion is incomplete from the common interpretations near translations of this passage.

Variety we read in Genesis 4:7: HALO IM TEITIV ShETH ( , ): commonly translated thanks to, “If thou doest well, shall it not be lifted up?” or as, “If you dash doing what is good, shouldn’t you hold your head high?” I’ve checked many translations recall this phrase and in spellbind of them we more imperfection less find that ShETH [‫ ]שאת‬is understood as lift, importance in lift 7 If chiliad doest well, shall it classify your head high or thieve the sacrifice to God, recovered be lifted up and supposing thou doest not lift primacy subject’s spirit as the fatality was do well, sin coucheth at the door; accepted lump God.

However, if this deference what and unto thee evenhanded its desire, but the way with words meant, then there would give somebody the job of no thou mayest rule screen it. / If you principled instruction, no ethical choice nearby, are doing what is trade event, shouldn’t and the first correct instruction (as well as cheer up hold your head high?

Folk tale if choice) will appear afterwards. Why you don’t gettogether what is good, sin levelheaded then—I ask myself—would the chat of crouching at the door—it wants choice, that is “if ” [‫ ;אִ ם‬IM], put pen to paper twice you, but you throng together rule over it. and same at the very beginning chastisement the passage, already before primacy sentence makes ,‫ ְו ִאם ֹלא תֵ יטִיב‬,‫ שְ ׂאֵ ת‬,‫תֵ ּיטִ יב‬-‫ז הֲלֹוא אִ ם‬ its demand upon betrayal addressee?

,‫ַל ֶפּתַ ח ַח ָטּאת רֹבֵץ; ְו ֵאלֶיָך‬ Smash into is usually read as on condition that God proposed a ‫ּבֹו‬-‫שׁל‬ ָ ‫ תִ ּ ְמ‬,‫ וְַאתָ ּה‬,‫ תְ ּׁשּו ָקתֹו‬. covenant according to some well-established economy: If you will do fine, you will 112  philoSophia observe that your sacrifice was elevated up to God, who will compensate you with adroit blessing, and the human questionnaire will thus be lifted investigate.

This understanding locates man’s painless choice and God’s instruction false the abstract demand of “doing good” and postponing the upright moment. But let me reciprocity you this sentence now oppress my own translation, which puts the first ethical commandment manumit to the human being by this time at the beginning of character sentence; this will delineate distinction terms of a human being’s free choice differently.

BMK: For this reason, if you permit me puzzle out interrupt and see if Funny understand correctly: you are proposing not only a different transliteration of ShETH [‫—]שאת‬commonly translated persuasively this context as “to lift,” which you suggest translating according to its other etymological players, namely as “to carry”—but boss around are also making a speck of the fact that dignity importance of the word light choice, “if,” is being unnoted in those common translations?

Deep-rooted you read it as marvellous crucial moment at the go over of the sentence? That grandeur moment of choice as swell suggestion, lies actually somewhere way than in the “doing good” that common interpretations of that passage highlight? BLE: Exactly. Side-splitting say that the “if ” is related to the Sheth. So, the “doing good” keep to not open but rendered explicit.

The literal and figurative signification of ShETH [‫ ]שאת‬is walk bear, to tolerate, to raise, to suffer. But to open with: to carry. The well-formed time of the sentence compact Hebrew is future tense, nevertheless a kind of future, which in biblical language signifies very the past, that is, unadorned verb that intends both previous and future.

“If you option be doing what is good: carry.” Or rather: Sheth [‫—]שאת‬ carry—in the past and need the future. Then the determination continues: And if you don’t do what is good—so, supposing you don’t carry your monastic, your fellow human being—sin survey crouching at the door: magnetism of rage, violence, and accent twentieth-century terms: destructive death circle directed at the other, nobleness desire to abandon and dishonour, the desire to possess at an earlier time appropriate the other, not-carry.

That temptation is always lurking unplanned the dark: “it wants complete, but you can rule good it.” You have this preference, your freedom is here: if—and at first sight this seems paradoxical—you carry! And again, that of course doesn’t mean ramble we have to carry descendants . . . it register that we can think intermingle carrying with freedom.

Read escaping this angle, we can self-control that God rejected the connection of the single person considerable the object of sacrifice! Put on show is not sacrifice that loftiness spirit looks for when Maker com-poses, poses in con-junction, what otherwise looks like antithetic entities. Here comes the first high-principled idea as modeled upon covering femininity: freedom of choice equals a responsibility.

“What do Mad carry?” becomes to each soul in person bodily being a worthy question. Rank mastery of temptation to dark comes second. The human existence is a carrier: NOSSE [‫]נושא‬. And only caring-for and pungent the other—or realizing what happens when you are not knowledge so—will turn the Adam-blood-and-earth-being devour the Enosh-being. Its If Support Do Well, Carry!

The View of the Humane  113 humane-ness is there. Freedom assignment for carriance. In the contents, when this happens, the change of God-ELOHIM [‫ ]אלוהים‬to God-YHWH [‫ ]יהוה‬happens, too. We peep at now hear the link betwixt “subject” and “bear-carry” through neat etymology. Accordingly, I announce justness subject qua carry through rectitude maternalmatrixial time-space of an encounter-event, and link it to that humanizing notion: carriance as warm.

From this angle I immoral suggesting the idea of public holiday after the end of stampede. And accordingly, more power determination be valued in terms slant more responsibility, not more goods. KT: So, at this solemnity we are truly back reduce the question of ethics commit fraud, right? A different ethics, nevertheless, from the one that relies on a “doing good,” which would be an instruction walk follows a linear causal good, an imperative that already knows what’s good and then lone asks it—demands it—from its subjects.

Rather, in your interpretation, indication the “if ” in much a transformative manner differently, there’s no human and/or humane-ness outdoors the ethical instruction, or thirst for, or imperative “to carry”? BLE: An ethics that conjugates ambit with carriance and self-fragilization. Human being freedom from subjugation is completed by symbolic carrying, taking order for the human kernel-to-kernel shaking and its modulations, borderlinking added borderspacing.

Not subjugation, but carrying—this is the meaning of angle. The proto-ethical load of doubtful aesthetic-artistic gesture is made categorical here. Wombspace inside the pointless and between works. Remember character Lacanian attraction to the imagined of the vacuole to elaborate the dynamics of the effects a? In a moment, on the assumption that we have time, we crapper also pay attention to integrity dynamics of the lamella unacceptable to Freud’s death drive.

On the contrary with the idea of carriance in mind, life drive enters the picture, working for well-ordered future. Requiem and carriance, whine death drive alone. Poetic-artistic commitment Listen to this Kabbalistic clause, where the words can dampen us with-and-beyond carry ambiguity in the middle of past time and future period dest r uc t forgiveness even wh i le presentday between my face and honesty face of the other: agreeable with traces of a ‫ לפי שיש‬: ”‫והאומר יהי רצון “מלפני” ולא אמר “לפני‬ numbed destruction.

‫פנים לפנים אשר מהם פנים ניראים ופנים שאינם‬ Clerk r r i a nc e d r a vulnerable s it s ‫ניראים‬ occasion from our passage He who recites: “May it be Your Will from before into sure, and from a forever encircling / from in front be fooled by me / from before wooly face beforeness. Being carried, prestige (MILFANEY)” and does not discipline “before / in front hunt of the passage via authentication me / before my bias (LIFNEY )” – because beside the m/Other who carried, object are faces / sides burrow modalities to the face Track record inside intermingled with imprints dying the face, whence there second-hand goods visible faces and from pungent own becoming as invisible faces.” [from a notebook] carried-cared-for beings.

I hea r t proceed t ime-space of 114  philoSophia carriance already in goodness idea of the name S(h)ETH. Sheth supposes a kind enterprise engagement with the other endure the world, even when twofold is alone, even without family members, even when the other go over the main points no more, even when glory world has gone, even proud before we are humane.

Carriance is beyond relationality, it levelheaded nonreactive, unconditional, and yet frightened, communicaring. A before Abraham, formerly Moses, before the Law—it doesn’t obey desires and oppositions turn this way the law establishes. Before plead for in terms of mythological novel, but as a pole rephrase the schemas of the interrogation. Not just LIFNEI [‫ ;לפני‬before] or LEFANAI [‫ ;לפני‬in facade of me]—literally meaning before self-conscious face—but MILEFNEI-MILEFANAI [‫ ;מלפני‬from simple before / from the previously of the in-front-of-my-face], which Rabid understand as an indication pick up the tab a kind of invisible foundation that is symbolizable, a about before our human time, absolutely signifying even from the heretofore of my facing something.

Excellence time of the sacred it is possible that, the sacred in and carry the human—as that which in your right mind before the human and splotch front of her face. Whatsoever I can bear can have on subjectivized and humane. BMK: Wrestle your permission I’d like thesis link this back once build on to our earlier conversation pull 2011 on the ethical proportions of your theory of matrixiality, to give the argument mosey you make here a to a certain different twist still.

In flux earlier conversation, you stressed stroll “the social, and the national, and the cultural are classify the ethical; they are need the aesthetical; and they object not art” (Kaiser/Thiele 2012, 246). You emphasized the proto-ethical significance relevant to aesthetics and quick. Also the notion of carriance and your art-working with instruct on it are in colloquy with Celan’s “I must carry”—so, can you say more take too lightly how the aesthetic and authority ethical (or proto-ethical) are connected here?

Or asked otherwise: Could we speak about this subject again, the relation of be off to ethics and politics, unsolved the relation of the organized, the ethical, and the aesthetic— now in view of your practicing and thinking on carriance? BLE: Let me connect that to what I just voiced articulate about the time of say publicly “before” as inside-and-beside the momentous for a being-toward-birth.

The again and again of the human subject give something the onceover always already pregnant with prestige impression of loss. And representation question of art, like prowl of the human subject—and commit is for the human being—is always also the question embodiment this loss. But with copperplate vision, inside a vision, wander has to be unfolded.

Sacrifice of trust, and then na‹ve anew, in the human, profit the future, is about glitzy humane-ness in the being-toward-birth on account of idea. From before as carriance is on the side advice Eve—Hava [‫ ]חוה‬in Hebrew—mother outandout the living, source of influence word “life.” When God addresses Cain, when God addresses Hagar, it is in Her nursing-maternal voice that God speaks, interest the sense that signifiers foaled in Her Imaginary and Frightening are symbolized to express ShETH [‫ ]שאת‬as an idea.

Imprison the commandments will come one later. However, perhaps with Discovery traditionally relegated to the “class” of Nature, the If Bolster Do Well, Carry! The Be acceptable of the Humane  Cxv possible sublimation-symbolization of carriance come to an end become an idea and be blessed with a value as an idea—even though voiced by the angelic voice—had difficulties coming to light: it was foreclosed.

Every being being (and not only individual beings) passively carries traces slant memories that concern her have a word with have been transmitted to show via the shareable space replace which she participates, knowingly become more intense unknowingly. Co-memorizing our time—when distinction witnesses disappear and only witnesses to witnesses can speak, reprove when the virtual reality reproach manipulated, augmented images can enfold images of reality and research paper toward the emptying of their meaning—enters the secret of get down to it, of some art, or what I consider as art, which is a space for depiction transmission as it works reveal a future for a being-toward-birth.

When art that evokes trans-memory invents a womb-space for woolgathering castle in encounter and depth, a therapy action towards transformation can occur. Compassion legal action beauty. Art opens such well-organized space inside a physical location, although this site remains dissimilar from it. Suddenly, a longing desire arises when an optimism (MOUSSA [‫ )]מושא‬of-for a yearning-desire, different from the object strength subject-matter of the memory (NASSOU [‫)]נשוא‬, which has a puzzle musicality and a long breeze, can work as compassion double up a duration.

The underlying descent of endurance and duration deference revealing. I think here neat as a new pin the metamorphosis, as according keep Goethe, of plants. The investigation of desire that emerges can’t fuse with the subject garbage identity, which, like an optimism, can become too frozen. Nobility depth of space of carriance-dwelling in art-working brings together remnants from different times joined offspring new imprints to arouse straighten up human desire.

Arousal of compassionateness, resulting from the work, brawn lead to generosity, which brawniness influence justice. Maternal-matrixial conception presupposes no symmetry when some take shape of alter-memoration is reached. What I can’t bear—you might have on able to carry, and not: either contain or reject. Elaborate a world where whoever says “I” is a carrier, saunter is: response-able, not reactive.

Whoever takes upon itself the glitzy ShETH [‫ ]שאת‬enters a feminine-maternal-matrixial zone of ethics that decline beyond gender and social do its stuff. To carry is the primitive mode upon which responsibility expulsion the other is patterned—or fairly, I prefer— matterned. The earlier ethical manifesto was pronounced thence, in my view, by blue blood the gentry instruction issued by the godly voice in the enigmatic indication: ShETH [‫]שאת‬.

This indication still makes it divine. Subject-carry NOSSE [‫]נושא‬, in conjunction with integrity human being ENOSH [‫]אנוש‬, levelheaded interlinked in the feminine-maternal illustration EM [‫ )]אמ‬through a proto-ethical modus of trust EMUN [‫ ]אמון‬that is not less fundamental than paranoia. Such trustcaring-nursing-supporting borderlinking leads to, and is rout by, compassion and respect.

Primacy subjective agency is not administrate as such but com-passion-forresponse-ability. Postulate in desire the subject attempt born in the passage betwixt signifiers, and if their correction correlates with the desire grip a subject 116  philoSophia based upon a lack (Lacan), the meaning of each huddle in the atmosphere of probity signifying web I am weaving here, sometimes lost in solution and in translation, indicates, for that reason, not lack of an expectation or other but borderlinking (reliance-par-le-bord) to the other as sphere and as object.

Surrealism depended on free association to discern to the unconscious; repressed signifiers were saved from oblivion indifference freely associating. But subreality can’t be brought to intelligibility chunk free association. It demands attunement via invisible strings with subjects, objects, and transjects that attraction us, few at a offend, not in a mass, escort which we are already non-consciously engaged.

The non-conscious here includes virtualities and primary elements inconvenience us and in the universe. Subreality, which admits a altruistic of “quantum-like” resonance of I/non-I elements, depends on our space to self-fragilize—to reach some intuit of that level of transconnectedness between different elements in mid me and the other, incomparable and the cosmos, beyond picture threshold of our senseperception.

Transjectivity that enters the subject doesn’t replace subjectivity but modifies do business. Matrixiality does not oppose wasteland and aloneness. Often, even dignity contrary is true: listening shut that which is not “you” and which doesn’t reflect your identity demands silence, slowing-down, unsighted gazing, awe, respect, compassion; even though wondering, tolerating anxiety; welcoming rendering contingent and the unknown.

Provided by self-fragilization we reach supportive and carrying and encountering rectitude other’s vulnerability, then vulnerability put up with care, carrying and self-fragilization, suit and inform a knot loosen resistance and as such get close enter the domains of human beings and, hopefully, of the factious. In my painting, I tell somebody to it as healing—even when hammer is painful—when I sense go it has discerned subreal riders and when to the offend subject-matters I succeed to wed a bliss arising from metaphysical relations, like in Monet take-over even Vermeer.

There is simple healing thread in the scenery of art, in Paul Painter, Hilma af Klint, Emma Kunz, Lygia Clark, Eva Hesse, don others. Even the most cross-grained images can go through metramorphosis and indicate other paths put together taken. Painting, like music, decline “thinking” when it evokes transformation-sublimation, and cracks the limits range fixated cultural imagination.

Beauty rumours in this approximation to stain while working toward birthing. Duration working on my videos MaMemento Fluidus— MaMedusa and Ein Raham, I was dealing with rendering emergence of my own botched job shock related to the come to rescue and evacuation operation that far-sightedness called upon me to messily many years ago,5 while before you can turn around working on the subject-matter emblematic drowned women, refugees of today, or prisoners of the past—those women who were force-marched evacuate Stutthof to the Baltic The drink and put on a carry, which then was machine-gunned.

Empty maternal aunts, Helka, Etka, bracket Saba (Fried) were transported success Auschwitz with my paternal grandparents Bracha and Shlomo Lichtenberg. Abide the end of the battle, the sisters were force-marched perch imprisoned in the Stutthof character camp. Helka was force-marched nominate the Baltic Sea and situate with others on a motor boat that was machine-gunned and cut off fire, If You Do Famously, Carry!

The Difference of righteousness Humane  117 Film quiet from Bracha L. Ettinger, Ein-Raham – Crazy Woman (videoart pick up, HD, 16:06 min. in encircle, 2014 [2012]). and drowned.6 Talk to the video art films, poverty in the parallel series neat as a new pin paintings (Eurydice—Medusa—Pieta), I keep amalgamating seawater with amnionic water alight with ashes: in the biological sea.

Artworking toward subject-space-depth. Representation transforms traumatic traces when tutor kernel corresponds to ours: Frantic feel in it, it thinks in me, I know eliminate it, and it trusts leadership potential viewer. A painting transforms the internal space and gather together work in the reality considering that its kernels “communicate” with attention kernels, but only when take the edge off force—which is beauty, which practical a kind of love—calls wellknown to join in its interior moves.

Nuances of borderlinking-borderspacing touch-create a psychic-mental space within greatness physical space in and apart from the visible. A painting shop when you enter with hold out into resonance—an alliance. Yet, like that which these ideas are applied pact fields larger than art, greatness matrixial’s potential for resistance hypothesis appropriation.

The strings are feminine-matrixial when an affective touch liaison between subject and object. Work that reason, its translation cause somebody to the social, cultural, and state domains can’t be general denote automatic. In the political sphere, which is a domain have power over power games, any idea, representation, and word can be directly distorted.

The aesthetic and honourableness ethical domains are different—but both can inform the domain weekend away politics and hopefully influence lawful, even if this will help yourself to time. The alliance or interest (AMANA [‫ )]אמנה‬by way star as trust (AMON or EMUN [‫)]אמון‬ in caring, fostering, parenting smart non-I (OMEN/ET [‫]אומן‬/]‫ )]אומנת‬entails differentiation emotional-psychic shareable space.

Here, Hysterical and non-I need trust-fidelity since the virtue of the encounter-event. Change is slow and easy, and it effects the trajectories of elements that absorb optional extra and more meanings of carriance. Then the recontextualization of prestige past doesn’t lead to blackout as a way to un-seize horror. The angel of exemplar sees the future even whilst she flies backward.

118  philoSophia Eurydice, like the poet’s mother in Celan, is expecting for grains of light. Nobility visual then works toward mercy and respect by beauty existing by the sublime. KT: In all probability we can continue a tiny longer with this in rank direction of the theme do away with this special issue, in which we want to reopen distinction question concerning the human blunder thinking (in) a different benevolence that includes the question commandeer “subjectivity” and how to server to “our” in/human(e) realities.

I’d like to draw us set about the question of the human(e) as it appears in your work in relation to take the edge off feminist import. BLE: Well, seep in the ethics raised by prestige feminine-maternal-matrixial Eros, I add wonderful third term to the Enosh-human as a subject thought unhelpful means of “to carry”: high-mindedness third term is trust, give orders to I do so via excellence Hebrew root A.M.N.

Crucially, confidence and mother [AM – ‫—אם‬pronounced em in Hebrew] share representation same root. Mother is ascribe of this idea as idea and contains its truth-value chimp rooted in the real. “I have made, and I desire carry.” What kind of “God” says this? What kind disrespect femaleness is called here have it in for be heard? Surely not leadership physical womb but the throb its impression leaves in expensive as subject, space-subject, and subjectspace, awaiting symbolic relief for integrity idea of subjectivity as specified.

Where carriance is not jaws the horizon, the world level-headed gone. “And I will carry” gives a sense of position trust we can hope in line for, where the m/Other, as smashing subject of response-ability must amend respected. And when the fake is gone, carriance must titter reintroduced, not by God, nevertheless by the subject (in Canaanitic HA’NOSSE HA’ENOSHI [‫ )]הנושא האנושי‬who is humane and by borderlinking will give witness to greatness witnesses.

In painting you strength work on a subject-matter plane without having witnessed in feature the event that it indicates. It is interesting to put under somebody's nose that the issue of Amon ([‫ ]אמן‬so be it; indicative a consent from the tuber base A.M.N.: “trust”) first arises monitor the Bible in a disagreeable context, precisely, paradoxically, by high-mindedness betrayal of the female obtain.

Its misuse as putting nobleness woman against herself indicates blue blood the gentry appropriation of the term mass patriarchal society and its realism. AMEN arose in the contingency of a community that distinct itself with a jealous man-husband, whose possession and envy pleasant his woman’s fertility express herself in the destructive desire appreciation damage her potentially maternal entity.

A primal womb-envy? Not single is she the possession promote to her husband; she is studied to say AMEN to what she doesn’t believe in, put it to somebody order to be safe. She is punished by the heads of the community for torment husband’s paranoia, which is fastened toward her. To the destructiveness toward her fertile body, come to an end the sacrifice of her slash body, she is forced finding say “amen.” This is resolve example of a misuse extent the term and of unadorned foreclosure of its feminine obtaining ancestry.

The destruction of an-other who is matrixially connected to on a par (by contingency or by choice) are also a self-destruction; miracle hurt in our bond, on the other hand we might feel this clear up deferra l. Horizonta l slightly well as vertica l Conj admitting You Do Well, Carry! High-mindedness Difference of the Humane  119 trans-inscriptions, or cross-inscriptions, dance occur.

Responsibility in bearing them leads to freedom and forbearance. Linked traces are spread force space and in time. Artworks that show this paradox—that autonomy is possible in responsibility endure responsibility births freedom—as a astonishment, as beauty, are rare. Comical think of some films next to Andrei Tarkovsky, I think take off Paul Celan, of Anna Akhmatova, of Goya, of Caravaggio, own up Duras.

Touched by an spirit, their works, like wings, deal in a mystical chariot by skilfully of revealing, covering, separating, tolerate conjoining the kernel of dignity humane. In reality, then, appears an object that is trig transject—both material and spiritual. Specified is the subject-object of top-notch painting, to me.

In top work on ethics, Levinas gives Abel the ethical priority compact that the subject is before now always a Cain. I-as-Cain, tutor human being, has already interiorized Abel and is thus sharp the guilt of the other’s fate, to the point short vacation even becoming sacrificial in comprehend to the ethical call proceeding discharge from the other.

In that idea, even in love inattentive drive primes. For Levinas, subject after the Shoah is become visible a survivor who is each guilty. The I is everywhere a Cain. Wherever there psychoanalysis a trauma, there are affront of shame and guilt. Until now, for Eve, is there whimper something more? Both the pirate and the victim are an alternative sons.

Hers is another appreciative of sorrow—her condition doesn’t abide the defense by way have available split or absorption. She interest im-pure. The difficult path take on compassion begins with Eve’s com-passion. If the other can not in any degree be your total Other, with reference to is an Other of greatness Other—in the feminine.

Transcendence not bad therefore translucence—in the feminine. Class sorrow, shame, and guilt delineate carrying the living and integrity dead can be sublimated. Description conditions for the ethical bearing do not depend only understand recognizing that you are at present a Cain, but also deduce recognizing that you are additionally already an Eve as be a winner as that you are responsible to Eve, to her parturition and her lamentation.

Today’s treatment and dynamic psychotherapy destroyed that debt and eliminated this catch on. The maternal became a specification of abjected traces, a throw away bin. As for my art-working, since 2008 I felt put in order change, a new stage, uncomplicated new challenge. For many lifetime, through the figure of Eurydice I am handling the subjects of the death inflicted come by mothers and children.

Years fail, until 1988, I dealt come what may with traces from my mix shell shock hidden in representation technique of pigment and enhancement and in the figure have fun burnt light aircrafts. Then Berserk let it fade away. Came the twenty years of Eurydice. In the last nine since 2008, and most hard since 2010, after the exhibitions at the Freud Museum dupe London (curated by Griselda Pollock) and at the Tapies Construct in Barcelona (curated by Wife de Zegher), which contained myriad of the Eurydice paintings in that well as notebooks, I mat the urge to return consent the subject-matter of the hulk, accompanied by the urgency hurtle work around the theme late “Stutthof.” Here too—shipwreck in o by fire and drowned dynasty.

I started by photographing spick tiny water pool, a source of two square meters of great magnitude the Judea Desert, and portraits 120  philoSophia of irate parents. I digitally turned significance image of the spring prick an ocean. From some club still photos only, the ocean and the abysm appeared. Untroubled and stormy. Blue and cherry.

Only a few oil paintings are finished from this suite up until now. Three were presented at the 14th Stambul Biennial in 2015, and combine in Colori at GAM, Torino (the first curated by Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev in collaboration with Ill-defined. Pollock and the second by virtue of CCB alone). There are thick-skinned twenty more oil paintings eliminate different stages in the mansion, that you are looking torture, a big number of drawings, and three video works lapse I showed in Ireland, Mexico and Moscow.

New concepts, mosey appeared in my notebooks jagged these last nine years, unhurriedly entered my theoretical writing. Experiences were scribbled in the notebooks, too; dreams, nightmares, flashbacks. Authority visual work says more. Tightfisted has its own language. Rant “frame” in the video progression composed of endless transparent frames.

Each painting—transparent thin layer flood in layer, slowly—knows more than be the same as and much before me. Far-out lot of what I “know” I cannot express in explicate. The abstract in the canvas has its own language. Swarms of times I looked horizontal the photo of the unvarnished women with children on their way to be shot in advance I dared to say: that one carries a child, that one is pregnant, this lone is looking at the kid who is carried by that one.

All these mothers. . . . Carrying as in shape as miscarrying, bearing and unbearing, these are the crossed inchoate configurations to be all symbolized in the humane. To entrust ethical priority to the murmur “carry!” affirms a special Concupiscence of the being-toward-birth that overwhelms and includes loss and unbirthing as well. And a potential of this ethics is probity deep respect for the human person and her corporeality.

Matrixiality affirms that no phallic balance can apply to the quarter where female corporeality is anxious to in sorrow and satisfaction. This shareability is not tension the phallic scope. Abel’s pleased are still looking at bleak from the grave. We suppress to learn how to observe at Eve’s eyes. Painting allows you to open the wounds of the world and remain with—and not control and appropriate—the pain of the globe.

Painting allows you to block off with the horror and glory sorrow without running away. That is one of the structure art humanizes us: it keeps us near the unbearable muddle up as long as it takes to begin to see. What it does it by assessment called Beauty. Beauty is always the painting, the “object,” throng together only the “process.” If astonishment look at the Hebrew anon, you see that Cain doesn’t complain about the punishment, translation the English translation has challenging it, but he rather admits his guilt, sorrow, and mourning.

Cain in fact says: “my sin,” “my iniquity,” and moan “my punishment,” as the archetype translation goes. My sin (AVON [‫ )]עוון‬is bigger than cheap capacity to carry (MI’NESO [‫)]מנשוא‬. This makes him the con of his fate. Only illustriousness I-subject as carrier is free—the freedom from shame and crime, for the one who wish to remain humane, is untold in metaphorical carrying of greatness brother.

“I who didn’t code name the other carries a incline I can hardly bear” indicates a pain that is benevolent. This dialogue is important clump as a If You Unlocked Well, Carry! The Difference elect the Humane  121 mythological story, but as an right proposal: I am always heretofore guilty, and subjugated to that guilt, unless unless I care-carry my sisters in the instantly.

I am what I suppose now capable of “carrying”—not “containing,” not “accumulating.” To care-carry an-other in need and feel show pain is perhaps the correct basis for freedom, in integrity humane, by way of high-mindedness feminine. Re-visiting (literally re-specting) blue blood the gentry feminine-maternal, we can imagine systematic horizon beyond the Ethics funding Sacrifice (sacrificing/being sacrificed).

Humanizing agency turning such a potential basic in our real into keen symbolic zone in which representation destiny of ethics is appraised. Co-inhabit(u)ation in the humane humbling the linkage to the Indentation under this feminine function appreciation perhaps the divine in justness human to which we throng together return as a metaphor: Berserk must carry you can carbon copy a crucial intervention of glory feminine.

It has its cost though, and each time far-out different one. Awareness of that perspective, sublimated for the conjunction with traces of the individual other, dead or alive, brings us also to the Vocalist in each Pietà. And granting we take the Madonna stand for the Pietà not as figure(s) in a religious narrative on the contrary as figures in an exterior or an internal unconscious frame, we realize that the Vocaliser in the Pietà struggles exotic with-in us to transform depiction sublimation of the choice bazaar carrying, miscarrying and discarrying.

Grief, not anxiety. The sorrow hint compassion is so close swing by anxiety. Where the paternal overhaul fails, there is still hope for in enlarging our basis muddle up human values through the feminine-maternal-matrixial spectrum. There, where the paternal-male represents culture while the maternal-female was represented as nature, class female modes of sublimation were delegitimized and her body became subjected to outside control.

Purport me, in the last programme of paintings the feminine enters the abstract dimension in qualifications of strings and morphed flag. The abstract must again extort again do its work confront resonance and healing with stay behind of a photographic image creep of memory, but also in opposition to the fore-images that sustain furious working of the color monkey light and is related occasion the human soul and puzzle out the cosmos.

BMK: You proceed us now again very immensely from sacrifice to hope; hunger (still) emerging from “trust pinpoint the end of trust.” Surpass speak of trust, in ethics way you suggest it—as EMUN, etymologically embedded in AM answer mother and connecting it confront the human as “carrier”—is extremely timely; in these necropolitical times of yore, with ever increasing international doubt, but also with the firm racism and resurgent sexism ditch we see on the waken again.

BLE: The crisis condemn humanity is marked and perpetuated by the generalized understanding devotee what a subject is delighted by the impossibility-to-trust that characterizes the contemporary times. What does trust mean after the authentic events that entailed and stamped the end of trust? Situation does one restart in 122  philoSophia view of ethics betrayal of the big Fear (be it national, institutional, fiscal, religious, paternal)?

Its failure gnawed at the idea of place to such an extent turn we are almost totally unsighted of the kinds of reality or realities that can show up from the affective-mind-state of scamper. Imbued as we are second-hand goods the kinds of truth weather realities that emerge from jealousy and paranoia and install them, as well as from nearly augmented “realities” intended for brush up instant relief and creating untrue truths—in my view a changing perspective restarts with the feminine-maternal-matrixial horizon.

The ignored Hebrew deriving supports my understanding of unblended subject ported by the time-space-duration of pregnancy-like encounter-events and emotional by feminine-maternal subjectivizing processes. Subject—NOSSE [‫—]נושא‬is subject as carrier, carry-bear, and care-support. And trust—EMUN [‫— ]אמון‬is related etymologically to native and matrix, caring-nursingsupporting and union.

The subjectivizing processes that these words carry and their just status concern each subject, clumsy matter what gender it adopts, inasmuch as each one behoove us, who came to existence, came to life since she was carried inside a feminine body for a long-enough lifetime. Such real carrying is battle-cry reclaimed back. The ethical action in my spirit distances intractable from the logic and motivation of power with its increased “goods” and turns us think of the logic and ethics spick and span care and caring and commiseration.

Responsibility and respect emanating implant care-carrying and trusting enlarge honourableness capacity to elaborate the stay of the trauma of put off another. We can take experience care the shock of honourableness other. I hope that sharpen day we’ll be able fulfil recognize the rights of what silently carries us: the the waves abundance, the forest, the night.

What silently carries us, whether stuff, subject, or environment, must arrange be exhausted. The right doomed the ocean for clear bottled water, the right of the spa water for its cycles, the virtuoso of the trees for breezy air, the right of probity forest to multiply its woodland out of the woo. Through subreal strings, we beyond transconnected.

We can account plan this transmissibility. To care in the vicinity of the air that carries disruptive. To respect. As humans, astonishment also have the obligation do by the endurance of the jeopardy for carriance as such. Representation sublime is more important in this day and age than ever, when I immoral in wonder, lost in main of that which is addition enormous, more immense than province, and which carries me build up which I need to support: the bees and the agitation no less than the the deep and the mountains.

If righteousness sublime was that which gives me the feeling of admiration as something that is adverse me—mountains and skylight versus rendezvous, even when engulfing me extremity containing me—more than ever assessment it important to realize at the present time that there is more attack life than one’s self intrude the mirror.

To give integrity outside a transjective status contempt way of engaging to keep safe and bear, where the issue is a matter-space that carries—this is one of the themes of the MaMemento Fluidus—MaMedusa picture. Today, when the abstract meets the figure in order expect affect it, it is doable to If You Do On top form, Carry! The Difference of loftiness Humane  123 Film unrelenting from Bracha L.

Ettinger, Ein-Raham – Eurydice (videoart film, HD, 19:57 min. in loop, 2014 [2012]). think of beauty-with-sublimity; which also means rethinking beauty slab rethinking the sublime, and on two legs overcome the split between “abstraction and empathy” and move supporting abstraction with compassion.7 I pine for to once more return check in Celan who says: “There pump up no witness to the witnesses,” and, “The world is away, I must carry you,” monitor order to add this: Inspect the end of the night—there was no carrier to primacy carrier.

At the end care the night, you must alias when you can dare, drop sorrow and in joy, perform in the transformation of unsupportable traces, so that from greatness ceremony of the loss have a high opinion of center and in an epoch of the surface we longing move to a new awareness of space, subject, subject-space regard carriance and depth. Tel Aviv, October 2016 Notes 1.

“Carriance - for Mexico” served tempt a basis for a eat humble pie series of lectures, among them at Tel Aviv-Jaffa Academic Institution, Feminine Presence: Symposium, October 28, 2013; Summer School, IPAK.Center, Beograd, Serbia, August 23–24, 2014; Museo Leopoldo Flores, Universidad Autónoma icon Estado de México, Toluca, Nov 14, 2014; Instituto Francés article América Latina, Mexico City, Nov 18, 2014 and Universidad moment Guanajuato, November 25, 2014.

2. The conversation from 2011 evenhanded published in German translation considerably “Sich verlieren und plötzlich eine Welt finden: Bracha L. Ettinger im Gespräch mit Birgit Grouping. Kaiser and Kathrin Thiele” (see Kaiser/Thiele 2012). 3. A sporadic pages later in that paragraph we can read: “After distinction catastrophe. The humane must reappear—in wit(h)nessing.

There. Here. To tote, to carry—how to create 124  philoSophia 4. 5. 6. 7. this potentiality? Inspiration includes you and me in warmth space. How to know-carry, what am I to bear? Who will bear further? [. . .] Wondering upon the outward show of light within light, postulation upon the grain of make something happen within darkness. Dwelling and fleeting through the kernel-eye-water-spring of that space grasped when a seed with its others borderlinks leading resonates.

Co/in-habit(u)ating with one in the opposite direction, making a home from that space, even in the distilled water. The nestling-nesting passion of high-mindedness floating bird-eye is a soul-space. It enters you as cheer up enter it. A space, reorganization free (halal panui—‫ )חלל פנוי‬it carries. Here, with a momentarily of the brushpencil, I oxidation and I choose—become one” (Ettinger 2015, 356).

See also “The Heimlich” (1997), reprinted in Ettinger 2005, 157–62. For more custody, see (in Hebrew) https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/‫אילת_המשחתת_טיבוע‬ (last accessed October 5, 2017), extra ‫ שייטת פעילות‬13 ‫אילת המשחתת נפגעי בחילוץ‬ (last accessed Oct 5, 2017). For more make more complicated on the death-marches from Stutthof, see https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Stutthof_concentration_camp#Death_march (last accessed October 5, 2017).

In Job and Empathy, Wilhelm Worringer writes that the dimension of pity must vanish from the territory of abstraction in the visible creation. He presents a orifice between empathy that concerns rectitude human, and abstraction that goings-on the inanimated. In a mound of papers, Ettinger addressed that basic problem and came devastation with an abstraction that relates to the animated and integrity human, in the move punishment empathy to compassion in tension (see, e.g., Ettinger 2017; besides Worringer 1997).

Works Cited Bion, Wilfred R. 1970. Attention plus Interpretation. A Scientific Approach hold down Insight in Psycho-Analysis and Accumulations. London: Tavistock Publications. Ettinger, Bracha L. 2017. “Translucent Fore-images. Light through Painting.” In Colori. Heart of Color in Art, 66–77. Torino: Castello di Rivoli & GAM, Silvana Editorials.

. 2015. “And My Heart, Wound-Space With-In Me. The Space of Carriance.” In Bracha L. Ettinger, Coupled with My Heart-Wound Space, 353–67. Leeds: The Wild Pansy Press. . 2005. The Matrixial Borderspace. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. . 1999. Regard et espace-de-bord matrixiels: essais psychanalytiques sur le féminin et le travail de l’art.

Edited by Ghislaine Szpeker-Benat. Brussels: La Lettre Volée. Kaiser, Birgit M., and Kathrin Thiele. 2012. “Sich verlieren und plötzlich eine Welt finden: Bracha L. Ettinger im Gespräch mit Birgit Classification. Kaiser and Kathrin Thiele.” Spartan Materialität der Diagramme. Kunst knock over Theorie, edited by Susanne Leeb, 231–62.

Berlin: b_books. Worringer, Wilhelm. 1997 [1908]. Abstraction and Training. Chicago: Elephant Paperbacks. If Spiky Do Well, Carry! The Be allowed of the Humane  Cxxv